What strikes me most about the comments from Linda Fabiani and Alex Neil is the extent to which their thinking about the constitutional issue appears unchanged by the passage of a decade in which everything else has changed dramatically. Their obsession with setting a date and publishing a ‘prospectus’ directly echoes the obsessions of the period immediately after the 2011 Holyrood election when it became inevitable that there would be a referendum. There has been no reframing of the constitutional issue and no reorganising of priorities and no reconceptualisation of the campaign. There has been no rethinking whatever either in the light of the experience of the first referendum or in view of the social and political upheavals of the subsequent ten years.
Regrettably, what is true of Linda Fabiani and Alex Neil is also true of Nicola Sturgeon and her inner circle. The poverty of imagination and dearth of boldness is matched by a lack of strategic aptitude which is barely explicable in a party that has enjoyed such a prolonged period of electoral success. There is no political genius behind that success. There is only the weight of the SNP’s electioneering army and the woeful inadequacy of the electoral alternatives. It’s not so much that the SNP wins as that they don’t lose.
But the SNP’s leadership seems not to appreciate the difference between winning and just not losing. The leadership supposes – with some justification – that it has an almost invincible election machine. It is perhaps unsurprising, therefore, that they see all challenges through the eyes of a general command with such a weapon at its disposal. If it’s good enough to win elections, it’ll serve just as well for the challenge of restoring Scotland’s independence. Worse! If it was good enough for those purposes ten years ago then why bother even considering any change?
So it was that when the pandemic struck not a single moment’s thought was given to whether and how the difficulties it presented for campaigning could be overcome, far less whether and how the circumstances of lockdown could be turned to the advantage of the independence campaign. The pandemic pretty much precluded campaigning as this is conceived by the SNP leadership. That is to say, ‘traditional’ election campaigning involving a great deal of in-person interactions both among campaigners and between campaigners and voters. It is safe to assume nobody in or close to the SNP leadership considered the possibility of a different kind of campaign. The sole consideration was what would play best in the context of adversarial party politics. Nicola Sturgeon issued her infamous cease and desist order to the SNP membership and the whole Yes movement.
Here we are! Approaching eight years on from that first referendum with absolutely no progress having been made and Scotland’s entire political class – with depressingly few exceptions – still wedded to the mindset that informed that first referendum campaign. As Linda Fabiani and Alex Neil demonstrate with their talk of setting a date and producing a manifesto/prospectus. Nobody, it seems, is making the connection between such outmoded thinking and eight years without any progress. Eight years in which Nicola Sturgeon has worked assiduously to prevent her approach to the constitutional issue from being ‘contaminated’ by any novel ideas or fresh thinking.
If you find these articles interesting please consider a small donation to help support this site and my other activities on behalf of Scotland’s cause.
3 thoughts on “A poverty of imagination”
Reblogged this on Ramblings of a now 60+ Female.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Heartfelt and true, Peter. Social media – the alternative to the MSM – has a part to play, but even its most popular channels are circumscribed by selfish interests and regulated by algorithms set to root out dissents that rage against the prevailing orthodoxies of Unionism and the trans lobby, both of which are opposed to independence. The reasons? They are owned by rapacious capitalists and designed and manned by socially and politically retarded incels and misogynists. The situation in NI offers some relief because Sinn Fein could not have won as convincingly as it did without moderate traditional Unionist support, so we can actually see the tide changing there. At the next Irish elections, the party will field the full complement of candidates for the full complement of the seats available, and will probably take Eire, too. If NI goes in the next few years, the pain of Scots who want independence will be great because the difference between our two approaches will be highlighted and underscored. Theirs, bold and determined; ours supine and lacking any real will. Kissing cousins we ain’t.
I’m sorry to disagree, Peter, but I have never been convinced of Nicola Sturgeon’s commitment to independence, not since I first encountered her in a wee public hall with Alec Salmond when they were campaigning for the joint leadership of the party many years ago. I thought then and think now that Mr Salmond was wrong to have dropped Roseanna Cunningham. I don’t say that Nicola Sturgeon has no interest in independence, but, for her, it is an abstract concept that fluctuates as the wind blows, and I believe she is a devolutionist at heart. She is also woke by inclination and not just by self-interest, which is why it has taken such a hold in the SNP, and she is no feminist, again only committing to skin-deep adherence to feminist thinking, or she could not have even contemplated self-ID, which the GRA Reform Bill is. The sheep who surround her are like all those who think they have found a strong leader and are sadly mistaken. All totalitarian-inclined leaders surround themselves with weak people who will never stand up to them; it is their hallmark; and, ultimately, their downfall. Like poor Cassandra, desperate to be heard and believed, who saw clearly what was coming to the Trojans through their own stupidity and gullibility, we, on the margins, all weep in frustration, seeing clearly what will play out, and unsure if we have the resources and stamina to eliminate the Greek gift in time.
LikeLiked by 5 people
As usual Lorna, great comment.