Speakers and what they say

Neil Mackay appears to be convinced that “there is a clear commitment to a referendum taking place next year”. (Scottish independence march to be held in Paisley as AUOB unveil spring plans) In this he is far from alone a large part of what used to be the Yes movement seems similarly persuaded. Although this may in the majority of cases be due to a desperate need to believe rather than any dispassionate assessment of the supposed commitment. After nearly eight years of pusillanimous prevarication from the SNP Scottish Government independence activists are so hungry for action of any kind that they tend to give little or no consideration to the precise nature of whatever action is being proposed. Or how tentative, guarded and hedged around with conditions and caveats the proposal may be.

If developments follow their customary course then it is likely that these people will learn too late how important it is to attend to the detail of what is presented to them as everything anyone might wish for. What is concealed by the blandishments of political rhetoric is at least as likely to be something no thinking person would want. It is never bad advice to read the small print. And between the lines. Listen to every word. And the spaces between the words.

I grant that the SNP+SGP/Scottish Government now gives the impression of being more intent on giving the impression that it is intent on holding a referendum in the second half of 2023 – probably September. The cynic in me is immediately suspicious of such effort. What it conveys to me is that the intent may not be quite as solid as it is being made to appear. That same cynic is ever mindful, too, that the SNPs apparent new-found determination is being measured from a very low base indeed. When you have spent the better part of eight years seizing on any excuse to avoid action of any kind then it is pretty easy to look comparatively enthusiastic about any kind of action.

Neil is wrong. There is no “clear commitment” to a 2023 referendum from the SNP+SGP/Scottish Government. Even if we allow that the language currently being used makes it increasingly difficult for them to renege, all that should do is bid us focus more intently on exactly what it is that they aim to do. If someone says that they are now determined to do that which they previously maintained they could not do, it is only sensible to inquire whether what they are now saying they will do is the same as they thing they previously said they couldn’t do. Has their capacity for doing what they are mandated to do suddenly changed? Or have they redefined that mandate to refer to something that is easier for them to do?

Maybe the SNP politicians now deigning to speak at Yes events will clarify just what it is that the SNP+SGP/Scottish Government intends to do. Maybe they will tell us what kind of referendum is being offered to us. Maybe the crowd will listen to them despite the distraction of porcine aerobatics overhead.

If you find these articles interesting please consider a small donation to help support this site and my other activities on behalf of Scotland’s cause.


4 thoughts on “Speakers and what they say

  1. The SNP deigning to speak at all Yes events is likely an attempt to manage expectations before they get out of hand and the SNP’s bluff is called. Neil MacKay may well be wrong but AUOB is doing everyone a great service by essentially forcing the issue.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. “Or have they redefined that mandate to refer to something that is easier for them to do?”

    And that is surely now the favourite given that the number of open goals that the current leadership have managed to turn in to own goals in the last 7.5 years.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. So there are two problems, the first being that some don’t trust the SNP to come up with Indy Ref 2, and the second that the AUOB Indy marches and rallies appear to some people to have been taken over by some anti-SNP actitivity and speeches even, some trying to protest about the SNP not coming up with Indy Ref 2, some anti-nuke stuff, some anti-Tory stuff, and even some background save our planet from the dreaded fossil fuel stuff.

    Whereas most people just want Indy Ref 2, the SNP as the main party to come up with it, and to go on marches that are about Independence, and not whatever protest is flavour of the month – like even an anti-monarchy one. That’s not what YES is all about, YES is about Independence, and then people can support whatever policies we all want, abolish oil, abolish trees, abolish cars, abolish space travel and even make Andy the next King of Scots if that’s what the majority want. Without Independence none of that is in the control of the 5.43 million People of Scotland.

    So getting back to the problems – a lack of faith in the SNP and a lack of faith in AUOB, the answer is indeed simple. The SNP need to make a very solid presence at ALL marches and rallies, otherwise they’re fink-rats, and they’re oot.

    Except, be careful where you walk around Ferguslie, I know it quite well, used to drive through it from a place I worked, whereas you don’t. Stick to the route until you’re into Wellmeadow Street.

    And that’s all I have to say about THAT.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.