Why should I take Nicola Sturgeon seriously?

And when an independence referendum comes – as it will – it will no longer be a choice between independence and the status quo, but between independence and a Tory regime which is intent on crippling Holyrood.

Nicola Sturgeon: Independence is our only protection from power grab

I had pretty much decided not to write any more this week. I really dislike repeating myself. And there is nothing new to be said about the situation. It is very wearying trying all the time to come up with new ways of saying the same things. It is intensely frustrating to be explaining the same things over and over to no evident effect. To be constantly focused on the stupid things politicians say and the things they say because they think the people are stupid will tend to induce anger which must be kept in check – mostly. It is profoundly depressing to see so many lessons unlearned and genuinely distressing to watch as the same mistakes are committed over and over again. Is it any wonder I often feel disinclined to say anything at all knowing it is all wasted effort.

But here I am! And there she is! Nicola Sturgeon provoking me again. Me and everybody else who is capable of seeing behind the rhetoric and beyond the horizons of the moment’s political expediency. I have questions? I have questions prompted by the above quote and even more questions concerning the mindset that informs the words.

The first question that came to mind on reading those words was, when were we ever faced with “a choice between independence and the status quo”? What status quo? The status quo as it was a year ago? A month ago? A week ago? Yesterday!? Nothing is standing still. Nothing except the cause of restoring Scotland’s independence. The ground is constantly shifting under our feet as one British earthquake after another shakes up everything that should be at least reliable, if not constant.

It’s not just policies any more. Although goodness knows we have been well and truly pounded by the policies of successive British governments wielding the power afforded them by the Union. What is being broken apart is the very basis on which political authority is legitimised and exercised in Scotland. What is being dismantled is nothing less than the constitutional underpinnings of Scotland’s democracy. What is being constructed from the remains is a new constitutional arrangement that legitimises and imposes direct, autocratic rule by the British state, allowing the British political elite to ‘legally’ override Scotland’s democratic institutions and the will of the Scottish people.

What we are witnessing is the finalisation of Scotland’s annexation by England-as-Britain and the completion of the old ‘Greater England’ project in its new and even uglier guise of ‘One Nation’ British Nationalism.

And none of it is new. None of it is just happening now. All of it is part of a process that has been ongoing since even before the Union was imposed on Scotland. A process that was given new momentum by the rise of the SNP and the increased democratic dissent emanating from the British state’s peripheral territories. Nothing that is happening now was unforeseeable or unforeseen. All of it was predictable and predicted.

The British establishment has been “intent on crippling Holyrood” since 2007. With greater urgency added in 2011. In fact, the British establishment never intended that the reconvened Scottish Parliament should be anything other than crippled. It was hobbled and shackled from the start. For the British, devolution was never an alternative to Westminster rule but a means of preserving the Union which imposes the sovereignty of their parliament over the sovereignty of Scotland’s people. For Scotland, devolution was never an alternative to independence but a means to the end of restoring Scotland’s rightful constitutional status. Something to be tolerated rather than celebrated. A burden to be grudgingly borne rather than vigorously defended. An alien contrivance to be discarded at the earliest opportunity.

The choice facing us never was and is not now “between independence and a Tory regime which is intent on crippling Holyrood”. The choice is between the Scotland we aspire to and a British state we would rightly dread if only our political leaders would properly identify it. That has always been the choice. It is the very core of the constitutional issue and the one thing that remains constant – until it is no longer a choice.

Let there be no mistake about this! The British political elite aims to remove that choice. That choice hangs like Wallace’s battle sword over their ‘precious’ Union and their delusional idea of what ‘Great Britain’ is and their grotesque fantasies about what it might become. Eliminating that choice has become an imperative. Preserving the Union has always been an imperative for the British ruling elites just as ending it has always been an imperative for Scotland and its people. This is not just a political issue. (Hence “Tory” is irrelevant.) It is not even just a constitutional issue. (Although that is the ground upon which the issue must be contested.) It is an existential issue. (When the issue is decided, only one will remain – Scotland or a new British state into which Scotland has been totally subsumed.

I read Nicola Sturgeon’s words and yet again I am overwhelmed by the impression that she just doesn’t get it. That her understanding of the constitutional issue is markedly different from mine. And fallacious. She seems to understand it more as a matter of policy than as a constitutional issue. She certainly gives no impression of comprehending that it is an existential issue. Her ‘strategy’ appears to be to issue angry warnings about what the British government is about to do; furious objections while they’re doing it; and angry protests after it’s done. And that is all. If you’ve ever watched Ian Blackford perform in the House of Commons then you have seen the SNP’s ‘strategy’ in its entirety.

Given this evident failure to grasp the true nature of Scotland’s predicament and six years of paralysing inertia while the ‘strategy’ described above grinds away mechanically and to absolutely no effect other than the mix of ennui and annoyance induce by Blackford’s over-rehearsed outrage, what should I make of Nicola Sturgeon’s assurance that a referendum will come? Especially in light of the fact that this assurance is almost as familiar as Ian Blackford’s three speeches – the one he makes when Boris is threatening to fuck Scotland; the one he makes while Boris is fucking Scotland; and the one he makes as Boris lies back with a cigarette and Scotland limps off to the shower.

Why would I take that assurance seriously? What could Nicola Sturgeon do or say to make me take it seriously? What are the chances she’ll do or say anything to make me take her assurances seriously when she isn’t even aware that they are no longer being taken seriously by a growing number of people?

Why am I even writing this?

8 thoughts on “Why should I take Nicola Sturgeon seriously?

  1. Watching the SNP is probably like watching the manufacturer of buggy whips around the time of the introduction of the automobile.

    SNP policy: “We must make better buggy whips.”

    The population: “We want a car.”

    The SNP have to throw out their current tactics and realise we have a large fascist state in embryo which is occupying our country.

    If we do not disengage RIGHT NOW we will shackled for the rest of this century.

    We have got to be seen as independent before the UK can legislate against it. That’s by 31 December this year.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. I suppose to be constantly waiting in hope for an Independence referendum that will never come is a kind of status quo .
    The journey is better than the destination, and this roller coaster that the FM has us on. is certainly vivid.
    One minute our hopes are raised and our imagination flies ever higher, the next downcast in the doldrums.
    It seems this is what the people of Scotland want (as our FM’s approval ratings are at record highs) .

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Those approval ratings reflect only her impressive performance handling the public health crisis. It would be a different story, I reckon, if that factor were not burying the growing dissatisfaction with here handling of the constitutional issue.


  3. As a independence voting family in Scotland Stuart Clark this is definitely NOT what my family and friends are voting for , more procrastination , more insults to our intelligence , more capitulation to a cabal of blatant international law breakers , more focus and attention given to reviled draconian policies rather than what they were elected to do , more lies and corruption in avoiding the exposure and outcome of a blatant attempt to jail an individual who was proven innocent and who done more for Scotland in attempting to gain our independence than NS has done in 6 years

    Liked by 1 person

  4. It’s just electioneering Peter. They know we in the wider Yes movement are fractious, impatient and underwhelmed and deem Sturgeon and co as ice cold on Indy. So, they have to throw us some well gnawed bones to keep at least enough of us happy and stop more defecting to us in the ISP.

    She has offered us nothing more than sophistry, rhetoric, as you called it. There is nothing concrete NOTHING. We have been promised NOTHING. It cost Sturgeon NOTHING, no political capital to put that out. She conceded nothing except the necessity of keeping some of us happy.

    I’ve been pointing out it’s only electioneering to anyone on twitter I see being all joyous and happy about it as though we have been promised something real. So it is working on some, who cannot read and think properly.

    They will come round when nothing concrete happens. We NEED ISP MSPs in Holyrood to sit in the chamber and act as the conscience of the wider Yes movement, something the Greens have signally failed to do. We will ask at ever FMQ’s when the referendum is, what moves the govt has made to prepare us for indy. Every single time until it happens. There will no longer be any hiding places for cold feet Sturgeon. Every bit of sophistry will be called out.

    We will push them to be more radical. If Indy isn’t coming then it’s time to use what we have to make folk’s lives better. The SNP has been holding back not wanting to make Devolution too good so we will still want Indy, but Indy never comes. That will be the choice we give them: Indy or better. Which they go for (or neither) will tell Scotland what they need to know about the modern SNP.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.