It goes without saying that the current public health crisis must be the Scottish Government’s first priority at the moment. But Chris McEleny is correct to point out that “there are still other major issues facing the SNP and Scotland”. Perhaps more importantly, he reminds us – all of us – that however much some might wish it, these issues are not going to simply evaporate while the government and the media are distracted by more immediately newsworthy matters. The coronavirus outbreak is undoubtedly a genuine problem. But don’t imagine for one minute that politicians around the world weren’t thinking of ways to exploit it before they started thinking of ways to deal with it. Scotland NOT excluded.
As obvious as the fact that the coronavirus outbreak must preoccupy the Scottish Government for the next several months is the fact that the British parties squatting in our Parliament together with their political masters in London will be eagerly looking for ways of turning the situation into a cudgel with which to pummel the SNP administration and the independence movement. The British state’s propaganda machine doesn’t stop just because people are falling ill and dying. It has no heart. It has no conscience. Expect no let-up in the relentless campaign of smear and calumny targeting NHS Scotland. To the slobbering hyenas of the British media, the additional burden on our health services means only new openings for attack. An overburdened system is a vulnerable system. The pack has scented prey.
Boris Johnson’s regime will be glad of attention being diverted from the Brexit shambles and the trade deal negotiations which have been rapidly descending to the same level of grim farce as has characterised the rest of the Mad Brexiteers’ asinine adventure. It is entirely possible, too, that the coronavirus will provide Johnson with a fine excuse for going back on his word not to seek another extension. Who could condemn him if he pleads inability to cope with concurrent cock-ups? He’s barely human, after all.
It is not only in Downing Street where the worry of dealing with a major public health threat will be laced with a vein of relief. I don’t for a moment suppose that Nicola Sturgeon will dwell on the fact, but fact it remains that the coronavirus outbreak is politically very convenient. It is perfectly possible for something to be both a tragedy and blessing, of sorts. It’s an ill wind that can’t be turned to some political advantage. Were unfolding events not all too regrettably real but following the script of some Netflix drama, one would be forgiven for thinking the pandemic too timely to be true. Fate can be cruel and/or kind. But very rarely both in such accommodating conjunction.
The health crisis comes at a time when the SNP, both as a party and as the administration, was facing increasing disquiet about its approach to the constitutional issue. None will admit it, but many in the party’s upper echelons will be discreetly heaving a sigh of relief that they will not now be required to face delegates any time in the near future. A chicken-wire screen in front of the stage is one movie cliche that conference managers will gladly eschew.
There will be some relief also that public health precautions now preclude other large gatherings at which criticism of Nicola Sturgeon’s ‘strategy’ may have been voiced along with ever more insistent calls for a rethink. Or a ‘Plan B’, as Chris McEleny might say. But the disquiet and discontent don’t go away just because there’s a public health crisis. The constitutional is all-pervasive and all-encompassing. It is overarching and underlying. It is more than three centuries old and only becomes more urgent as time passes. Injustice does not diminish with time. The longer it persists, the more corrosive it becomes. Nor is it diminished by intervening events – no matter how serious these may be. The coronavirus tragedy will not be the first to be outlasted by the imperative of restoring constitutional normality to Scotland.
There is absolutely no reason why the campaign to restore Scotland’s independence might not or should continue by whatever means are left to us and by whoever is not otherwise occupied dealing with the coronavirus outbreak. We can expect a screeching chorus of “Now is not the time!” from the BritNat harpies. We should be thoroughly inured to their self-serving faux outrage by now. There is never a time when it is not appropriate to act in defence of democracy and for the ends of justice.
The Yes movement may not be able to march. Yes groups may be obliged to cancel planned events. SNP branch and constituency meetings will fall victim to essential restrictions on gathering of any size. But this means only that we are freed to apply our energies elsewhere. There is much that can still be done online, for example. It may be a good time to start your own blog. Or to devote more time to reading and sharing existing material in support of Scotland’s cause. The web provides us with unparalleled facilities for communicating and collaborating on all manner of projects. Writing letters to newspapers may be something you’ve always intended to do but never found time.
Email still works fine. Why not let SNP MSPs and MPs know how you feel about the fact that the independence project has stalled – and not because of the pandemic! Tell them of your concerns. Ask them questions. And when answers aren’t forthcoming, ask again!
It would be all too easy for this latest setback to become a cause for despondency and despair, coming as it does on top of the disappointments and frustrations of the past five years. We must avoid this. We must use this time. If politicians can exploit such situations, so can we. We just need to use our imaginations, our skills and the networks built by the Yes movement.
As some of you may have suspected, all of this has been leading up to my own suggestion as to what the Yes movement and SNP members could be doing over the coming weeks. Regular readers will be aware that I had previously envisaged Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP providing the leadership that the Yes movement requires in order to become an effective machine for fighting our political campaign. This has not happened. Let’s say no more at this juncture than that the necessary leadership has not been forthcoming. My own ‘Plan B’ is that the leadership should come from within the Yes movement. The question which remained to be answered concerned the practicalities. How would it be done? I believe I may have the answer to that question.
I had been thinking that building a campaign with the necessary unity, focus and discipline would require a new organisation born out of or hived off from the Yes movement. The aims of the organisation would be threefold –
- to compel the Scottish Government to take a more assertive approach to the constitutional issue
- to facilitate by any means necessary the exercise of Scotland’s right of self-determination
- to devise a strategy to force constitutional reform built on the twin aspirations to build a better nation and end the injustice of the Union.
It has been brought to my attention, however, that a suitable organisation may already exist in the form of the SNP Common Weal Group. The stated aims of this group are, I am persuaded, sufficiently in accord with the aims set out above as to make it a suitable candidate for transformation into the kind of pressure group and campaigning organisation that is required if Scotland’s cause is to progress. I would urge everyone in the SNP and the Yes movement to at least consider how they might contribute to this transformation.
In the short-term, my hope is that this article might spark a more focused debate about taking the independence campaign out of the doldrums. In the longer-term… well… there is no longer-term. I am convinced that if the grassroots does not seize the initiative – seize it hard and seize it quickly – then the project to restore Scotland’s independence may suffer setbacks from which it will not easily or soon recover.
If you find these articles interesting please consider a small donation to help support this site and my other activities on behalf of Scotland’s independence movement.
8 thoughts on “Just the ticket”
Reblogged this on New Scotland.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Ramblings of a 50+ Female.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, the ‘restrictions’ do not prevent the yes movement from continuing its marches.
They don’t (yet) forbid large gatherings, they simply remove support for such. So people could still engage in such if they so desire, even though it may not be a recommended course of action/
Be adults, weight the risks, make a choice, and live with the consequences.
Not worth the hassle.
“. to compel the Scottish Government to take a more assertive approach to the constitutional issue
. to facilitate by any means necessary the exercise of Scotland’s right of self-determination
. to devise a strategy to force constitutional reform built on the twin aspirations to build a better nation and end the injustice of the Union.”
Laudable aims to be sure. Unfortunately, Sturgeon and her high heidyins have demonstrated again and again by word and deed, that they are card-carrying woke-obsessed crypto-Unionists.
You are not going to persuade, maneuver, or cajole, these wee pretendy nationalists to overturn the constitutional status quo.
This duplicitous FM and her cabal are corrupt beyond any possible remediation or redemption. That despotic regime needs to be excised or the body of the Party, and quite possibly the liberation movement itself, will perish.
That is step one.
Who can’t be persuaded can be replaced.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indeed, Peter, but how and by whom? I used to think NS was quite left wing. More recently I have become disenamoured by her right wing approach to some international issues, her timidity on social and fiscal issues and her hopeless pursuit of a Section30 without spelling out any exit strategy. I don’t think she has one.
I don’t share CW’s characterisation of her and her acolytes as “crypto-unionists”, but I believe they have become intoxicated by power and maintaining that power to the detriment of what should be their main objective – Independence. They should be eating, sleeping, pissing Independence.
Craig Murray has a very interesting montage of how Salmond and Sturgeon have responded to some big international issues. Instructive.
I think this should be the year she should go and hopefully be replaced by someone more independently minded, less controlling, more inclined to call out British/English nationalism/exceptionalism wherever it rears its ugly head. Someone more like AS.
Will SNP members have the guts to do it?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for this Peter. It seems to me that when the dangers of the virus are over, the YES Movement should then act for independence while the English Government of the UK is disarray.