The year of decision

Relax! I’m not going to do one of those ‘look back at the year’ things. Mainly because, if the BBC is to be believed, the best 2019 had to offer was a wean spewing on the First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon changing the date on her referendum promise again and something about butterflies. There was a UK general election in December which confirmed – as if further confirmation were needed – that Scotland would be a very different place from Tory England-as-Britain if our votes actually counted for anything. But look at all the pretty butterflies!

Reviewing the year just gone has become a particularly disquieting exercise for an unabashed Scottish nationalist like myself because I cannot help but observe the carnage and think how different things might be had Scotland not bottled it so badly in 2014. We should have been celebrating three years of constitutional normality. We should have had some successes that we could look back on with satisfaction and perhaps a little pride. We should have been enthused by the prospect of further achievements in the new year. A past we can live with and a future we can contemplate with something less than dread. Is that so much to ask for?

The only reason for mentally rerunning 2019 is the hope that it might end differently. There’s little comfort in knowing that it could have been worse. That probably means only that the worse that might have been is now the worse in prospect.

Not that everybody is so downbeat. If you read The National or listen to SNP politicians or follow the Yes movement on social media you might well suppose that 2019 has brought Scotland to the verge of independence. Not the same verge that we were on at various points in most of the last ten years. A new verge that is somehow more vergey than any of those other verges. This, we are assured, is The Verge. The ultimate verge. Parent to all other verges.

Taking a slightly less rose-tinted perspective, 2019 was more like a gap year. In terms of the two big constitutional issues – the UK’s relationship with the EU and Scotland’s relationship with the rest of the UK (rUK) – nothing changed. Or if it did change it went backwards. Brexit is still happening. And nobody knows what will ensue. Which could have been said at any time since the EU referendum in 2016.

The project to restore Scotland’s independence is still becalmed, sails flapping uselessly in air stirred only be the random gusting of political rhetoric. I am frequently castigated for being ‘negative’. But if two plus two must equal four then two minus three must, by the unforgiving rules of arithmetic, equal negative one. Strip away the happy-clappy positivity and the wishful thinking before totting up the numbers in the progress and regress columns and you just as unavoidably get a negative result.

Compare and contrast!

In 2011 we knew for a fact that there would be an independence referendum. We don’t have that certainty now.

With all that we’ve learned since about how the Union works and how the British state responds when its structures of power, privilege and patronage are threatened we now know that the confidence we felt back then was rather misplaced. We now know that we only got that vote because the British political elite was convinced that the referendum posed no threat to the Union. Having been disabused of that notion, they are now determined that the sphincter-slackening experience of 2014 should never be repeated. And we are learning that, absent thinking outside the box of the British political system, the Scottish Government has vastly fewer ways of making a referendum happen than the British government has of preventing it. Do the math! In terms of the probability of a referendum in 2020 as promised we are well into negative territory.

In 2012 we had an agreement with the British government and the assurance from the Scottish Government that the referendum would be held in the autumn of 2014. We have neither of these things now.

We not only don’t have the equivalent of the Edinburgh Agreement, we have a yawning gulf of ideological difference and mutual animosity that looks to be unbridgeable. And while we have the political promise of a new referendum in the second half of 2020 we also have awareness of the mechanisms and procedures involved and, unless we’ve succeeded in deluding ourselves, the ease with which the British can throw a variety of spanners in the precariously delicate works.

In 2013 we had a precise date for the referendum. We don’t have that now.

Nor is there the remotest possibility of us being given a precise date. Too many things have to be in place before that can happen. And every one of those things is an unknown variable. There is a vast sea of uncertainty between now and the announcement of a date.

In 2014 we had a clear route to independence. We don’t have that now.

Back then, we had a timetable for the restoration of independence. The dates may have been adrift by a few months either way. But we saw no reason to doubt that independence was coming. And sufficient reason to suppose that it would be delivered sometime in 2016. There is no such timetable now. It is undeniable that we have moved backwards from the position we were in then. The Scottish Government has no timetable. No programme. No plan. If we can’t be sure te referendum will happen, how can we foresee independence happening? In 2014 we knew precisely what we had to do in order to achieve our goal. Now, the route-map to independence is mostly blanks that can only be filled by resort to magic.

In 2015 we had an SNP majority in the Scottish Parliament. Now, we don’t even know that there will be a Scottish Parliament by the time of the next elections.

Such is the measure of the uncertainty we face. Since 2011 we have learned a huge amount about the strategies, tactics and methods by which the British state defends established power. The lessons of often very harsh experience. And yet the Scottish Government’s approach to the constitutional issue has not changed in the slightest. The last decade might as well not have happened for all the impact it has had on the thinking of the SNP leadership. They are totally committed to using the same process as for the 2014 referendum. And, should the referendum ever get to the campaigning stage, they are absolutely determined that the second Yes campaign should emulate the first one in every significant way.

Alex Salmond was a dancer. He respected his political opponents but had no illusions about them. He knew when to lead and when to swerve and when to go with his partner/opponent. He that it wasn’t enough to know the steps, you had to be able to improvise. He was conscious of the fact that the dance could very easily turn into a wrestling match. And he was aware that, in a wrestling match with the British state, Scotland almost certainly couldn’t win unless we could match them gouge for gouge and low-blow for low-blow.

Nicola Sturgeon is a marcher. A different kind of leader altogether. Not necessarily a lesser leader. Just different. She sees the goal, knows the cause is just and supposes that resolve will succeed. Nicola Sturgeon knows the “case for independence” inside-out and back-to-front. She is well prepared – and better able than any others I know of – to play the game according to the rules. But she seems to expect that the game will be played by the rules. She will steadfastly march the route defined by those rules regardless of her opponents’ ability to change those rules or their willingness to wantonly breach them.

Just as I decline to perform a post-mortem on the year about to pass, I offer no prognosis for the year to come. As noted, there are far to many unknowns – known and unknown – to make prediction anything other than an idle exercise. We can only speculate. We can only say if this then probably that – or perhaps the other. For such speculation to be at all interesting or useful, however, our ifs must be grounded in a realistic appreciation of what really is and what actually might be. No resort to magic. Thus constrained, any speculation I attempt must be far too gloomy for what is supposed to be a time of hope.

One thing I will say with, if not absolute certainty, then certainly a high degree of confidence. 2020 will be a decisive year for Scotland’s cause. By this time in 2020 Scotland will either be set fair on a course to becoming an independent nation again, or it will lie smashed and stranded on the reefs of unscrupulous, unprincipled, unconscionable British power.

The choice, and the responsibility, lies with us – the people of Scotland. In 2014, for fifteen unprecedented hours on Thursday 18 September, we held total political power in our hands. As a nation, we made the choice to hand that power back to a British political elite which, inexplicably, we trusted better than ourselves even in the knowledge that they had used a campaign of lies, threats and false promises to keep their grip on Scotland. In 2015 we had ourselves a wee rethink and, again as a nation, we decided to lend a big chunk of our democratic power to the SNP in the hope and expectation that they would help us rectify the mistake made the previous year. We’ve renewed that loan at every opportunity since.

In 2020 the SNP must justify the trust that we have invested in them. They must use the power that we have loaned them for the purpose intended. They must know that we are capable of calling in that loan. And willing to do so. Because that is how we exercise our power over those to whom we entrust it.

2020 will be an unprepossessing bairn that will grow into an exceedingly ugly creature unless we take hold of it and shape it, Let our New Year message to Nicola Sturgeon be this:

Get independence done! Get it done in any way you can! Resort to whatever methods you must! No more waiting! Just get it done!

A Happy New Year is not in prospect. Not as things stand. What I will wish whatever friends I have left in Scotland’s independence movement is the wits to know who can be trusted, the awareness to recognise what must be done and the strength to do it. And roll on 2021.

If you find these articles interesting please consider a small donation to help support this site and my other activities on behalf of Scotland’s independence movement.

Donate with PayPalDonate with Pingit

14 thoughts on “The year of decision

  1. A very readable article and slant on the Scottish independence issue. As and Englishman I once voted for the SNP I think it was 1973 when I was a student in Glasgow and I voted for Margot McDonald who seemed to offer a lot for a very depressed Govan. Nowadays I do wonder about the referendum issue of how often it should be held whatever the result. Equally if the answer is a yes, when would it be held again. Personally although I want our Union to remain intact I am not in favour of holding a people in one against its will. Maybe the discussion between Nicola and Boris should be about how often a referendum on the issue should be held, annually, biannually, every decade or maybe generationally?


    1. No politician has the rightful authority to deny or constrain the right of self-determination. That right belongs, inalienably, to the people of Scotland. Boris Johnson has no say in the matter. And Nicola Sturgeon has no right to ‘negotiate’ our right to decide our nation’s constitutional status.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Not “oh dear” at all Dr B.

        Just as it wouldn’t matter if the whole SNP, every one of the 125,000 members, stood up and repeated in unison in 2014:

        “There shall be no more Holyrood elections for another generation”

        and then

        “There shall be no more Referendums for another generation”

        that’s 125,000 out of an electorate of 4.1 million, and a referendum turnout of 3.6 million.

        In both those cases:

        1). Would you accept the decree of 3% of the electorate over the other 97%? Really? What about the decree of 2 people out of 3.6 million who voted in the referendum? Do you like dictatorships? Did Alex Salmond speak for you, does Nicola Sturgeon?

        2). Does, for instance, the Conservative party speak for you, and you nod your head and repeat mindlessly: “Ruth Davidson speals for me, Jackson Carlalw speaks for me, Boris Johnson speaks for me, Theresa May speaks for me, David Cameron speaks for me”?

        3). Would you deny those coming of voting age in the last 5 coming up 6 years, the chance to vote for their future?

        4). Do you believe in Democracy? Suffrage? The right to vote, the right for the people to choose our government, the form of our government?

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Thought provoking again Peter.
    Wishing you and your family a guid new year.
    In fact I hope and wish all of Scotland
    A guid new year.
    Let’s see what the SNP has for their way forwards with the Independence.


  3. ” What I will wish whatever friends I have left in Scotland’s independence movement is the wits to know who can be trusted, the awareness to recognise what must be done and the strength to do it.” Peter I wish this for you too. I wish that Nicola and SNP mandarins would listen to you, Craig Murray, Stuart Campbell, and other insightful people, and act on what they hear, because if they don’t the cause of independence will be lost.


  4. Why do we all have a feeling of dread for 2020? Because we have no confidence that Indy ref 2 is coming.

    That’s a sign of failure in the SNP leadership. We gave Nicola our support. We gave her a landslide. Now we demand some action, or she needs to shuffle over!


  5. First Minister Nicola Sturgeon “seems to expect that the game will be played by the rules. She will steadfastly march the route defined by those rules regardless of her opponents’ ability to change those rules or their willingness to wantonly breach them.”

    This is so clearly the case that some SNP supporters seem to deceive themselves into thinking that independence can be won through appeals to courts, or perhaps to Westminster parliamentary rules. The lessons of Ireland and the Chagos Islanders have not, apparently, got through: the UK is prepared to defy any democratically expressed political movement, any legal process and even economic pressure to pursue the interests of its aristocracy (politically – not used to denote titles), and it will pass retrospective legislation or mendacious legislation (such as the Brexit motion – incompatible with the agreement signed with the EU) without any compunction. The UK can only be constrained by compelling its rulers to yield.

    In the end, the Chagos Islanders had to accept foreign nationality; like Finland, the original Irish state had no optjon but to accept partition, with all those murderous consequences. Ukraine has now lost the Crimea – without mentioning the losses of the Tatars, whose land it was! Think of the votes for Westminster stooges in the south of Scotland: will we eventually have to accept that these areas are now just outposts of England, and build our nation from its core?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. “Think of the votes for Westminster stooges in the south of Scotland: will we eventually have to accept that these areas are now just outposts of England, and build our nation from its core?”

      So “the English of the Lothians” still exist?


  6. Happy New Year Peter. I fervently hope that Nicola grasps the nettle with both hands this year. If we lose I will still always remember her for taking the chance that was worth taking.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. The reason we don’t have certainty on these things you mention Peter is because 55% of our electorate voted to remain cringing subservient slaves ie House Jocks on the 18th of September 2014.

    I know many of those have now moved from No to Yes but they’re a little late to the party don’t you think

    I also know recriminations will not win our independence and I accept we have to be nice to them although personally I find that beyond me

    I don’t know if the SNP has the right strategy or not I don’t know enough about these things, but lets not forget whose really to blame



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.