There is certainly hypocrisy in David Mundell’s screeching U-turn on the matter of his willingness to serve under Boris Johnson. Just as there is dumb arrogance in Ruth Davidson’s bombastic pronouncements on the subject of a new referendum – her actual authority being in inverse proportion to her pomposity. Similarly, it is difficult to explain Richard Leonard’s dire performances at First Minister’s Questions (FMQ) without including stupidity as a significant factor.
But is there something more to all this than rank hypocrisy, vaunting arrogance and abysmal stupidity? Is it, perhaps, a mistake to dismiss such things as mere gaffes or to discount them as just evidence of the kind of character flaws which seem ubiquitous among British politicians? When taken together with the various form of dishonesty by which the British media allows the gaffes to go unreported and the character flaws unremarked, might we be looking at a much larger phenomenon?
Some time ago. in an article for iScot Magazine called ‘The death of truth’, I wrote,
It seems not enough to say that truth is being supplanted. That it is being overwhelmed by a “narrative contrary to reality”. For all its vivid persuasiveness, the concept of a “vast, permanent chasm between reality and perception” is wanting. Possibly because it leaves reality distanced, but intact. And the sense I get is, not of truth being set-aside or distorted or obscured, but of truth being demolished. Obliterated. Eradicated.
Not that I am suggesting some Orwellian plot to murder truth. But if making the concept of truth indistinct and elusive serves the agendas of a sufficient number of people with a sufficient amount of influence then what emerges from their behaviours and interactions may be all but indistinguishable from a conspiracy.
What is certain is that the British establishment has developed doubt as a powerful weapon in its propaganda arsenal. Pretty much everything that British politicians do seems designed to foster uncertainty. The British media does a bang-up job of spreading that uncertainty. This results in a generalised erosion of confidence, not only in politicians, but in the entire political system. It also leads to much confusion among voters and, at the very least, a reduced ability to make informed choices.
When people are confused and uncertain they are more easily led. Or steered. They are more readily deterred from effecting change. They are more averse to anything that can be portrayed as a risk. They are more inclined to favour the familiar and cling to the status quo.
An atmosphere of uncertainty and confusion also makes people more susceptible to anyone who offers a risk-free option. Or an option which, with the help of the media, can be portrayed as risk-free. It was doubt, generated and exaggerated by Better Together / Project Fear, which the British political elite deployed so successfully in the 2014 independence referendum. It was the plausible promise of a simplistic certainty that launched the Brexit fiasco.
Pervasive doubt leaves space for manufactured truth. When truth is diminished, reality is defined by the loudest and most intrusive voices. Last week, Mundell said he wouldn’t work with Boris Johnson. This week, he says he would. Next week, nobody is sure what he said – or when he said it.
Nicola Sturgeon is First Minister. She has the authority of that office. She has the democratic mandate. Ruth Davidson is treated by the British establishment – particularly the media – as if she has the same status as the First Minister. She is presented as speaking with similar authority. She is allowed and enabled to claim a mandate that she doesn’t possess. Keep this up for long enough and with sufficient intensity and the distinction between First Minister and nonentity is blurred. Davidson’s pronouncement are afforded a weight they cannot legitimately have.
At FMQ, Richard Leonard persists in asking questions about reserved matters. This may be, wholly or partly, attributed to stupidity. But, deliberate or not, it has the effect of causing confusion about the powers of the Scottish Parliament and makes it easier to blame the SNP administration for the deleterious impact of British government policies.
Leonard’s evident stupidity is appalling. Davidson’s pretentiousness is offensive. Mundell’s hypocrisy is disgusting. The British media’s dishonesty is despicable. But put all this together and you have a phenomenon which is quite frightening.
If you find these articles interesting please consider a small donation to help support this site and my other activities on behalf of Scotland’s independence movement.
3 thoughts on “In place of truth”
A most accurate analysis of the current scene.
Very worrying is that the pursuit of organised political and economic chaos is proceeding in parallel in the USA and in Britain, so we are facing an international onslaught on public perception.
The question arises – Who is behind the process? For sure it is not those whose names and faces we all know. These are the puppets, the marionettes dangled before us to hold our attention and attenuate our thought processes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It does appear to be quite a deliberate trick on the part of MSP Richard Leonard, when he continually asks, about, and complains about problems caused by Reserved matters.
He is hoping no one notices.
However, this past week, he was exposed, and roundly condemned by the First Minister, over just such attempted trickery.
For Labour, and same applies to Lib Dems, the social ills, he likes to complain about, are all prices worth paying for the Union.
He must know nothing is going to change under the UK set up.
He of course, offers the tried and tested….and failed Labour fantasy, that all it needs is a Labour Govt, in London, and Corbyn in Downing Street. But as we all know, there is no certainty of it. And besides, regards EU, and Brexit, it wouldn’t make any difference to Scotland. R.Leonard knows that. So do most of the Scottish electorate…. unfortunately for him, that is!
Regards Ruth Davidson, she is given greater priority, and “authority”, and a fair degree of deference, in Scotland by the media, that not even the Leader of the Opposition (Labour or tory) gets at Westminster!
It is all very deliberate.
The doubt is very deliberate, and it works no end.
The number of folks who really think Scotland is too poor, and needs London subsidies, is one example. There are still far too many in that category, even tho, they hate the Westminster system, and would like Independence.
Many of that group, don’t follow politics online, and get their news from the tabloids or some, from a few broadsheets, but ones that spin against. Likewise much of the BBC reporting, and certainly, television news is far more biased against Scotland,than BBC Radio Scotland tends to be…. But noT everyone listens in to that.
However, at least folks are beginning to stir. They see thru it all now, in a way, that they were unable to, previously.
The tories are well aware of this.
Despite their insane attempts to get control from Edinburgh to London, and in doing so, expose themselves as being even more anti Scottish than they let on, the voters will not tolerate it, nor will the Scottish Parliament.
But this useless letter the tories signed, is also a major problem for Labour and the Libs.
They cannot any longer pretend, Devolution is safe with continued UK rule.
If they are not going to stand up for Scotland, and meekly hope for the best, from whoever is in power at London, they too, will face political wipe out..To be replaced by new grouping in Scotland., who will help propel us to Independence…. that’s if we are not Independent beforehand, and the way it looks, we will be!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I weep for the death of the enlightenment.
It is so sad to watch how easily we give it up when it was so hard won and took some of the greatest minds to bring it into being.